In the 1830s, Charles Babbage pioneered the concept of a programmable computer.
One hundred and sixty years later, in 1991, his design was assembled by a museum â and it worked!
But that wasnât Babbageâs only contribution to the world of significance. He also put forward the Babbabe Principle which declared that highly skilled, high-cost laborers shouldnât be wasting their time on low-skilled work that low-cost laborers should be doing.
Babbage noted that highly skilled workers were spending part of their time on jobs that were more aligned with the skillset of lower-paid workers. Essentially, employers werenât getting dollar for dollar value when it came to highly skilled worker pay, because they were paying for skills that werenât being used all the time.
He suggested that employers could get more value by dividing labor, and by matching worker skillsets with the jobs to be done.
His principle went on to characterize the division of labor, and the distribution of wealth during the remainder of the industrial revolution.
â
â
Almost two centuries later, todayâs organizations are yet to get the memo.
Whether itâs MBA-graduates on six-figures painstakingly laboring over the correct positioning of a table in a Powerpoint proposal, or an entrepreneur spending hours reconciling transactions in their accounting software, Babbageâs principle is just not being heeded.
Author Perry Marshall put forward the following table in his book, 80/20 Sales and Marketing.
â
â
âBut Iâm a lowly entrepreneur with a team of two â I canât afford to outsource!â
â
Actually, you canât afford not to outsource â especially because youâre a resource-strapped company of two.
If you truly value your time and your abilities, youâll focus only on tasks worth at least $100 and above, if not more.
The cost of not doing so is far greater than the $10 you save by doing it yourself.
Having worked with hundreds of entrepreneurs, I often present them with this table and ask, âwhat percentage of your time do you spend on ten dollar an hour tasks?â
Most respond with half their time.
When I press them on why they donât invest more time into outsourcing their rudimentary and repeatable tasks, they respond without a hint of irony, âI donât have time to do thatâ.
âI donât have time to do thatâ.
â
I outsource about 30 hours of weekly effort that I previously performed myself, without any noticeable decrease in quality (and sometimes an improvement!) â thatâs almost a standard workweek worth of tasks.
But the real saving is exponentially greater.
By outsourcing rudimentary tasks, it frees you up to invest my time on high-value tasks that align with your strengths.
This creates a lot more value than repeatable process-oriented tasks because it means better results that feedback into your motivation to invest your time, and so the cycle goes on.
But if you find yourself doing all manner of monotonous tasks on top of your value-adding tasks, then youâre likely to find it much harder to keep going and stay enthusiastic about your work â because it feels like, well, work.
Process-oriented tasks that canât be automated can definitely be delegated or outsourced.
â
Entrepreneur and thinker, Naval Ravikant, suggests setting an aspirational hourly rate for yourself and sticking to it.
âNever do anything with your time for less than that amount â whether itâs attending a meeting or returning a package from Amazon⊠If I have to return something, and it costs less than my personal hourly rate, Iâll throw or give it awayâ
If you can hire someone for less than your hourly rate, do it.
Nowadays, there can be no excuse for not outsourcing rudimentary tasks that canât be automated. Platforms like TaskRabbit, AirTasker, Upwork, Fiverr or GetMagic, among others, can get you up and outsourcing today.
You should look to outsource not just professional tasks, but personal tasks that donât deliver you any joy â because this will ultimately free up both mental and physical energy for work, life and play.
Hate mowing the lawn, but you currently devote two hours a month to it? If your hourly rate is $100 and you can get someone to mow the lawn for $50, then you should do it, particularly if youâre not strapped for cash, and can reinvest that time into more pleasurable or profitable endeavors.
For some, mowing the lawn might be a form of therapy, and thatâs fine. Donât outsource it if it brings you joy.
â
People often ask me âwhat kinds of tasks should I outsource?â.
You and your colleagues should pay top dollar for the tasks that (a) youâre strong at, (b) are mission-critical, and to a lesser extent, (c) tasks that you enjoy.
For example, a website with strong UX is mission-critical, but it is not aligned with our strengths. We outsource it and pay top dollar as a result.
As for developing educational workshop content is; that is something we tend to do ourselves, or partner with reputable third parties we trust to co-create.
Youâll want to determine whether or not you can outsource mission-critical tasks in a way that doesnât fundamentally compromise quality delivered to the point where it compromises customer satisfaction, retention, and referrals. If you are in doubt, run some experiments, and then if all of your experiments fail, do them internally.
From a purely financial perspective, youâll also want to factor in how long the task will take to perform, factor in the time it takes to write and communicate the task instructions, as well as any teething time that may or may not apply. This type of thinking is particularly necessary if youâre outsourcing a one-off task, less so if youâre outsourcing a repeatable task.
You might also want to factor in urgency around a one-off task, and whether it might just be quicker to do it yourself and not risk the downsides of being late (eg. preparing a proposal thatâs due in 2 days).
Refer to the following chart for easy reference.
â
â
â
â
One of my business philosophies is to focus on your strengths â because no matter how much you work on addressing your weaknesses, thereâs going to be people out there who excel at that area, and whatever time you spend, say, coding â even though youâre mediocre at it, is time you donât spend, say, selling â which is where your strengths may lie. Essentially, youâre losing out with every minute you spend coding.
Look at it this way.
If you have two marketing channels, and one generates $2 for every $1 you spend, while the other generates $3, every dollar you spend on the former is actually costing you an additional dollar in returns from the latter.
You should put all of your chips into the latter until it is an exhausted resource, then you can reallocate the returns generated into other opportunities.
The same goes with how you choose to spend your time.
Having said this, youâll want to develop a requisite understanding of what youâre outsourcing so that you can truly monitor the quality of work, effectively communicate with your freelancer, and ensure that the end product is sufficient for your purposes. When I outsourced the production of my podcast, I had already been producing it myself for several months so I knew the basic ins and outs of podcast production. The same would hold true for design, marketing or development work.
â
â
You would be forgiven for thinking that outsourcing is all about cutting costs, and getting people outside of your company to do rudimentary work for bargain-basement prices.
But it could also extend to just the opposite â paying top of market prices.
When something is mission critical, but not a strength, you essentially have two choices.
Hire a superstar and pay them accordingly
Outsource to a freelancer and pay them accordingly
Say I need a gun digital marketer to run our companyâs SEO and SEM function.
I could hire and pay six-figures.
I could outsource and pay six-figures.
But, thereâs a third choice that Iâve become increasingly fond of.
Outsource the strategy work to a gun SEO consultant, and outsource the execution of said consultantâs recommendations for a much lower rate.
Essentially, pay top dollar for strategy and bargain basement prices for implementation.
Iâve had no qualms about paying several hundred dollars an hour for an expert to help me on projects such as marketing and sales automation, or a search engine optimization project for a website.
While the hourly cost might be high, weâre tapping into expert talent, and only have to pay them for the duration of the project rather than bring on full-time talent, who we may or may not always have valuable work for.
Instead of paying $100,000 a year, you end up paying $5,000 for up-front and ongoing strategy work, and another $10,000 for the execution, saving you 80%, or over $80,000 a year.
â
Hereâs a short but inexhaustible list:
At its core, anything that can be effectively codified into a clear, actionable step-by-step process, that doesnât come with unacceptable privacy, intellectual capital or quality risks, then it should probably be outsourced.
â
(Just Some of) What I Outsource
â
Nowadays, there is a trend for organizations to declare that âoutsourcing doesnât workâ and that they are âinsourcingâ instead.
But like any tool, outsourcing is only as good as how you use it.
You wouldnât expect a permanent hire to succeed in their role without a sufficient onboarding and training protocol, so why would you expect a lone warrior sitting halfway across the world who youâve never physically met before to do any better?
Youâve got to be explicit with your instructions.
Don'tâ leave anything to chance as far as your instructions go. As Toltec spiritualist and author, Don Miguel Ruiz, put it in The Four Agreements, donât assume!
Be explicit about every nook and cranny if you expect your hired gun to deliver what you envisage in the dark recesses of your mind.
For example, my process document for podcast guest outreach is about 14 pages long (thatâs a 2,000 word Google Doc with 12 point font, complete with screenshots, arrows, bubbles and captions!).
â
Some questions to ask when considering privacy:
â
Magic
â
â
â
âI forgot my credit card at the bar, can you send someone to pick it up and deliver it to my apartment?â
âCan you book me a flight for the Atlanta conference? Try to get me an upgrade with my usual rewards program.â
âCan you log in and respond to our customer support Zendesk emails every day from 5pm-8am?â
These are the kinds of requests that you can literally text your VA via Magic.
Magic learns about your work and life, remembers your preferences, logs in to your accounts, and interacts with your friends and coworkers as your very own dedicated assistant.
Find out more at getmagic.com
â
â
â
â
â
â
â
â
â
â
â
â
â
â
TaskRabbit / AirTasker
Tools like TaskRabbit essentially help you find people for all sorts of odd jobs â whether that be the aforementioned lawn mowing, to cleaning and removals, IT support, furniture assembly or handy work around the house.
I found somebody on Airtasker to collect almost 100 six kilogram boxes of paperback books from my teamâs old office, deliver them to my house, and store them in my spare bedroomâs wardrobe. This task was completed within just three hours of requesting the task, and cost me just $80.
If I had done this myself it wouldâve taken me at least twice as long â because I didnât have the necessary equipment or vehicle, cost me multiple trips, put me at risk of physical injury, and wouldâve come at a huge opportunity cost.
Given that I value my time at more than $13 an hour, this was a no brainer.
Find out more at airtasker.com
â
Freelancer / Upwork
â
Platforms like Freelancer and Upwork are great for onboarding contractors for creative work as well as finding virtual assistants.
Whether itâs web or mobile development, design work, writing, marketing, inside sales, customer service, podcast production or video editing, platforms like these can hook you up with talented creatives to get the job done, often for less than $10 an hour depending on the type of task.
â
â
Steve Glaveski is the co-founder of Collective Campus, author of Employee to Entrepreneur and host of the Future Squared podcast. Heâs a chronic autodidact, and heâs into everything from 80s metal and high-intensity workouts to attempting to surf and do standup comedy.
â
Steve Glaveski is on a mission to unlock your potential to do your best work and live your best life. He is the founder of innovation accelerator, Collective Campus, author of several books, including Employee to Entrepreneur and Time Rich, and productivity contributor for Harvard Business Review. Heâs a chronic autodidact and is into everything from 80s metal and high-intensity workouts to attempting to surf and hold a warrior three pose.