âI could write thatâ.
This is what you tell yourself as you read the trending work of other Medium authors.
So you create your own account. Youâve shortlisted a handful of story ideas that you think will absolutely kill. You start writing.
You commit countless hours to researching, writing and editing your stories before publishing. The dopamine you feel in anticipation of publishing your first story mounts.
You hit publish.
Hour pass. Days pass.
The avalanche of eyeballs and attention you were expecting appears to be missing.
âBuild it and they will comeâ you thought â at least thatâs what they told Ray Kinsella!
So you publish another five storiesâŚ.. crickets.
You publish another ten storiesâŚ.. nothing.
You donât understand whatâs going on.
Youâve done everything right â youâve done all of the things.
Despite all of this, youâre getting an average of just 100 reads per story!
You realise that the optimism bias is real, and this lack of traction ultimately serves to regulate your motivation.
Days later though, youâre back at it, buoyed on by an inner voice or tension that compels you to keep going. As Nietzsche said, âus humans like to fool ourselves to orient towards the futureâ.
A few weeks pass. Youâve just finished writing your 27th story and hit publish, not thinking too much of it. You hit the sack and resign yourself to yet another day of battling with the writerâs struggle.
The next morning, glassy-eyed with coffee still in hand, you notice something strange â youâve got an unusually high number of notifications on Twitter.
It seems that people are sharing your most recent story.
You log on to Medium and find that âstory 27â got over 10,000 reads overnight, and the number is accelerating. Over the next two weeks, âstory 27â would get more than a quarter of a million reads, earn you over US$5,000 in pocket money, and it would be syndicated by a number of external publications.
Inspired by this success, you double down.
You write two stories a day for the next weeks.
But a familiar and unsettling feeling creeps back in. These stories combined barely get 2,000 reads.
It would be another ten stories before you again felt the elation that comes with a story â an idea â of yours, being shared by tens of thousands of people.
â
And this is, in a sense, the essence of not just trending on Medium, but of success in any creative pursuit.
As Adam Grant puts it, âyou need a lot of bad ideas in order to get a few good ones. One of the best predictors of the greatness of a classical composer is the sheer number of compositions that theyâve generated. Bach, Beethoven and Mozart had to generate hundreds and hundreds of compositions in order to get to a much smaller number of masterpiecesâ.
Customized baseball bats, personalized shampoo and dog food formulated for individual dogs â these were just some of the ideas that Netflix co-founder, Marc Randolph, pitched to Reed Hastings, before coming upon the idea that would eventually become the streaming service we all know and love today.
Amazonâs Jeff Bezos too echoes these sentiments â âwe all know that if you swing for the fences, youâre going to strike out a lot, but youâre also going to hit some home runsâ.
Creative success is all about having many at bats.
Success on Medium is all about writing often â writing every day if you can.
â
Creativity is Having Many At Bats
â
Iâm a two-times Wiley author, and a Harvard Business Review contributor, and I too have to contend with this reality.
Of the 250 odd stories Iâve published on Medium:
20% of my stories command about 80% of my reads.
Thatâs not to say that the other 210 stories are all bad, because both luck and nature play a significant role in anyoneâs success.
And if youâre only getting 100 views, then you donât have a quality problem â youâve got a distribution problem.
â
Writers can derive comfort form the fact that this isnât just a convenient theory, but a universal law of nature, best espoused by Italian economist Vilfredo Paretoâs Pareto Principle, or the 80/20 Principle, which suggests that 80% of effects come from 20% of the causes.
For example:
â
Writing every day wonât just give you more chance of a lucky break â as luck is simply the intersection of preparation and opportunity â but it will also help you become a better writer, a deeper thinker, and cultivate for you a better sense of what resonates with your readers.
Write every day.
If you want to play the long game, it helps to disassociate from results and revel in the journey.
If nothing else, the feeling one gets when totally absorbed by a singular task â and the neurochemical response that follows â is well worth the price of admission, especially in a world where hyper-responsiveness and shrinking attention spans are suppressing many peopleâs ability to do truly great creative work.
As for this story? Thereâs an eighty percent chance it wonât get many readsâŚand thatâs okay.
â
â
Steve Glaveski is on a mission to unlock your potential to do your best work and live your best life. He is the founder of innovation accelerator, Collective Campus, author of several books, including Employee to Entrepreneur and Time Rich, and productivity contributor for Harvard Business Review. Heâs a chronic autodidact and is into everything from 80s metal and high-intensity workouts to attempting to surf and hold a warrior three pose.